You are viewing as a guest Login
 
     
  amstarbanner  
     
Home About Us Publications Checklist FAQs Contact Us    
 

Systematic review related publications

BC Reeves, J Higgins, C Ramsay, B Shea, P Tugwell. An introduction to methodological issues when including non‐randomised studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions- Research Synthesis Methods, 2013
 
 I Popovich, B Windsor, V Jordan, M Showell, B Shea Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Subfertility: A Comparison of Two Different Approaches - PloS one, 2012
 
B Windsor, I Popovich, V Jordan, M Showell, B Shea . Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies- Human reproduction, 2012
 
SL Norris, D Moher, BC Reeves, B Shea, Y Loke. Issues relating to selective reporting when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions - Research Synthesis Methods, 2012
 
J Higgins, C Ramsay, BC Reeves, JJ Deeks, B Shea . Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions - Research Synthesis Methods, 2012
 
A Koike, A Fukuda, K Sugihara, A Haruki, Y Morimoto. SESSION 48: CULTURE, CRYO AND COCHRANEO-178 Long term follow-up of 54 children born by IVM-IVF (In vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer) O-179 IVF culture medium affects postnatal growth in humans during the first 2 years of lifeO-180 Does long in vitro culture promote large for gestational age babies? O-181 Transfers of a vitrified blastocyst increase the likelihood of a term liveborn singletonO-182 A comparison of the quality of Cochrane systematic reviews and non Cochrane systematic reviews - Human Reproduction, 2012
 
G Wells, B Shea, D O’connell, J Peterson, V Welch, M Losos, P Tugwell. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis. 2010
 
BJ Shea . Assessing the quality of reporting in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. - 2009.
Read the entire article.Adobe
 
B Shea, M Boers, J Grimshaw, C Hamel, L Bouter . Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?- BMC medical research methodology, 2006
 
B Shea, D Moher, I Graham, BA Pham, P Tugwell . A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals- Evaluation & the health professions, 2002
 
K O'Rourke, B Shea, GA Wells.  Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials - Applied Statistics in the Pharmaceutical Industry (S. …, 2001
 
G Wells, D Beaton, B Shea, M Boers, L Simon, V Strand . Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. - The Journal of rheumatology, 2001
 
B Shea, C Dubé, D Moher . Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other tools - Systematic Reviews in Health Care, 2001
 

GA Wells, B Shea, D O'connell, J Peterson, V Welch . The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses - 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the, 2000

 
 
 
Copyright © 2015 AMSTAR All Rights Reserved |